Decision-Making on Additional Power Supply for the Timor System: A Systematic Literature Review of Analytic Network Process Applications

Authors

  • I Dewa Gde Budhita Mahaprasetya Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November
  • I Ketut Gunarta Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v6i3.2712

Keywords:

Analytic Network Process, Energy Planning, Power Supply, Systematic Literature Review, Timor System

Abstract

This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to synthesize empirical findings on the application of the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in energy planning and power-supply decision-making. The review identifies commonly used evaluation criteria, assessed alternatives, and strategic implications for electricity-system planning, particularly in constrained or semi-isolated systems such as the Timor System. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 framework, including identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion. Relevant literature was retrieved from Scopus and Google Scholar using keywords related to ANP, power-system planning, energy storage, generation expansion, and electricity decision-making. Of 52 records identified, eight studies satisfied the inclusion, eligibility, and quality-assessment criteria and were synthesized. The findings show that ANP effectively evaluates alternatives involving interdependent technical, operational, economic, environmental, and policy criteria. Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) and other flexible low-carbon technologies are generally preferred when reliability, flexibility, and policy alignment are prioritized, whereas conventional thermal generation remains competitive under cost-oriented scenarios. This review transforms dispersed ANP evidence into a structured decision-making framework for the Timor System and recommends evaluating future power-supply alternatives using reliability-oriented, scenario-based, and policy-aligned weighting instead of relying solely on economic comparisons.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kementerian ESDM, PM ESDM No.20/2020 Aturan Jaringan Tenaga Listrik. 2020.

PT PLN, “RUPTL PLN 2025 2034,” 2025.

H. Gonzalez-Urango, E. Mu, A. Ujwary-Gil, and A. Florek-Paszkowska, “Analytic Network Process in Economics, Finance and Management: Contingency Factors, Current Trends and Further Research,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 237, pp. 1–13, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121415.

T. L. Saaty, Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2013.

A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, Multi?Criteria Decision Analysis. Chichester: Wiley, 2013. doi: 10.1002/9781118644898.

H. Taherdoost and M. Madanchian, “Analytic Network Process (ANP) Method: A Comprehensive Review of Applications, Advantages, and Limitations,” J. Data Sci. Intell. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–18, May 2023, doi: 10.47852/bonviewJDSIS3202885.

G. Büyüközkan, Y. Karabulut, and F. Göçer, “Spherical Fuzzy sets Based Integrated DEMATEL, ANP, VIKOR Approach and its Application for Renewable Energy Selection in Turkey,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 158, pp. 1–21, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111465.

F. Kaytez, “Evaluation of Priority Strategies for the Expansion of Installed Wind Power Capacity in Turkey using a Fuzzy Analytic Network Process Analysis,” Renew. Energy, vol. 196, pp. 1281–1293, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.043.

H. Yang, W. Fan, G. Qin, and Z. Zhao, “A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1–17, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14041129.

M. Shafiee, “Wind Energy Development Site Selection Using an Integrated Fuzzy ANP-TOPSIS Decision Model,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1–20, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15124289.

S. K. Sahoo and S. S. Goswami, “A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions,” Decis. Mak. Adv., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–48, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.31181/dma1120237.

IAM, “Asset Management—An Anatomy V3,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://theiam.org/media/1781/iam_anatomy_ver3_web.pdf

M. Resch, J. Buhler, B. Schachler, and A. Sumper, “Techno-Economic Assessment of Flexibility Options Versus Grid Expansion in Distribution Grids,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 3830–3839, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3055457.

D. Singh and S. Pachori, “Planning for Grid Expansion and Maintaining Reliability in the Context of Electricity Storage,” in 2022 International Conference on Futuristic Technologies (INCOFT), IEEE, Nov. 2022, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/INCOFT55651.2022.10094374.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: an Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ, pp. 1–13, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

J. Thomas and A. Harden, “Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-19

How to Cite

Mahaprasetya, I. D. G. B., & Gunarta, I. K. (2026). Decision-Making on Additional Power Supply for the Timor System: A Systematic Literature Review of Analytic Network Process Applications. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, 6(3), 1521-1528. https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v6i3.2712